(If your IT boss had warned the head of your company and those warnings were being ignored then it is the head of the company who should be fired. You don't even have the excuse of being able to blame an external party. Your IT boss should be sacked for failing to manage this. Run the decrepit app that requires Java 6 in a virtual machine with an older version of your company requires you to use their own in-house plugin then they also count as idiots for failing to update it.Downgrade to an older version of macOS which can still run Java 6 and never ever be able to upgrade (new Macs like the MacBook Pro 16" can only run Catalina so this may not be possible or not for long).Switch to a different program from a different developer who is actually maintaining their program and either does not need Java or at least supports a current version of Java.Contact the developer and see if they have a solution, e.g.Java 8 or later, whilst some developers have been stupid enough to hard code their software to only work with Java 6 in theory Java software can work with other versions Try using a newer version of Java i.e.There is zero chance Apple will provide a version of Java 6 for Catalina. Remember this is not something that literally happened just this month there has been years of warnings. Home users can do what they want, by definition home users are not running a business on such obsolete software whereas business users have a duty to ensure they do not expose themselves to such problems or run the risk of potentially going bust when the inevitable happens. With warnings that Java 6 was obsolete having been issued for years there is no excuse. Even in the case where the original developer is no more it is the users responsibility to recognise this and move on. Arguably this could also be applied to some users who have also failed to move on. Whilst Java 6 was written by Oracle for Mac it was being distributed by Apple but Apple had been warning for years and years and years that it was obsolete and that really, absolutely, definitely, no more excuses that it would not be supported in Catalina.ĭespite this a number of developers have been incredibly lazy and/or stupid and failed to update their software. Supported platforms for DSE 6.8, 6.7 (EOSL), 6.0 (EOSL), and 5.1. (Java versions back to Java 8 currently still get updates.) Other platforms or versions may work, but have not been tested. The current version of Java is Java 12 which should give you an idea of how incredibly ancient Java 6 is. dmg archives again.Java 6 has not been supported by anyone for years and years and years. We are working on migrating that functionality to Travis CI so that we can offer. dmg archives for the macOS version of Fiji which might sidestep the GPR issue, but our macOS server that made the. Running Fiji directly out of the Downloads folder will not work completely correctly due to Path Randomization. I would recommend moving the Fiji icon into /Applications after unpacking the distribution archive. The GPR issue is also important to avoid. I also plan to update the Windows and Linux distributions of Fiji in a similar fashion, once the macOS-specific “legacy Java 6” issue is fully ironed out. is a full JDK rather than only a JRE, meaning that the Script Editor should now work again out of the box to develop and execute Java plugins from source.is a binary OpenJDK build licensed under the GPL with classpath exception, rather than a binary Oracle Java build licensed according to the non-OSS terms of Oracle JREs and.Note that this updated Java distribution: On the three systems I tested thus far, it appeared to fix the issue on one of the systems, but not fix for the other two. Unfortunately, the currently employed tweaks do not appear to solve the issue on all If you wish to test it, you can download the most recent Fiji for macOS and let us know here whether it works for you. The macOS version of Fiji is now distributed with AdoptOpenJDK 1.8.0_202 with tweaks intended to prevent macOS from complaining. I am working on an update to the macOS version of Fiji to avoid this issue. Yes, it is an issue with how the ImageJ Launcher works, together with how macOS handles attempts to link to the libjvm.dylib shared library. I think the default launcher has a problem and somewhere is still calling for Java 6
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |